GINA DOVER-JAQUES
READING GARDENS
Method
What Reading Gardens is
Working exclusively with analogue photography, my photographic practice is grounded in observation, patience and intentional image-making. Each exposure is made with the expectation that it will form part of the final body of work, reflecting a commitment to photographing moments as they are encountered rather than constructed afterwards.
Reading Gardens does not ask participants to explain gardens as they experience them. It first observes how expertise is expressed through attention, movement and engagement with place, before inviting reflection afterwards.
How the work is undertaken
Each study follows a consistent observational approach.
Participants are invited to move through a garden independently and without direction. I do not ask them to pose, repeat actions or explain what they are seeing during the visit. Instead, I photograph quietly as attention shifts naturally through movement, pause and engagement with the landscape.
Only after the visit do I invite participants to reflect on their experience. The questions are developed from observations made during the day, allowing photographs and reflection to form complementary ways of understanding how expertise shapes the experience of place.
Expertise is often expressed before it is explained
By observing first and asking questions later, Reading Gardens seeks to understand not only what specialists know about gardens, but how that knowledge shapes the way they look, move and engage with landscape.
How collaborations develop
Reading Gardens develops through sustained engagement with gardens and the people who care for them. Rather than seeking participants to fit predetermined categories, collaborations emerge through genuine curiosity, shared interest and an established understanding of place. The project is not built by collecting participants, but by allowing relationships to develop naturally through the landscapes themselves.
Participant Reflections
Following the inaugural Reading Gardens study at Rousham, I invited Advolly Richmond to reflect not only on the garden, but also on her experience of the observational methodology. Her responses offer insight into how the process is experienced from the participant's perspective.
Did the absence of direction or interruption influence how you engaged with the garden?
Yes, it made it easier to just appreciate the space, atmosphere and spirit of the garden and take my own lead
Was there anything about the process that felt different from other photographic or interview experiences?
I think the continual movement through the garden made a difference. Usually it is a question finding one or two spots and striking a pose. This felt like a series of tableaux which also caught the transition through the gardens.